Showing posts with label fandom. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fandom. Show all posts

Monday, June 01, 2026

Announcing: Notícias de Pfandom

If you're interested in science fiction, fantasy, and horror literature, movies, and television, fandom, comic books (banda desenhada or bandes dessinées, natch), and roleplaying games—and you're interested in the country of Portugal or speak and read Portuguese—you might enjoy my recently launched newszine Notícias de Pfandom. There've been two issues so far, and we'll publish monthly.

Issue number one (May 2026)

Issue number two (June 2026)

My co-editor for this project is one Álvaro de Sousa Holstein, who published the first sf fanzine in Portugal in 1983. His article, "Science Fiction and Fantasy in Portugal," which I printed in translation in The Stf Amateur #3, was a formative influence on my initial understanding of the history of the genres in the country. The piece provides useful context.

And if you'd like to receive Notícias de Pfandom on an ongoing basis, just let me know, and I'll add you to the distribution list.

***

Se se interessa por ficção científica, fantasia e literatura de terror, filmes e séries de TV, fandom, banda desenhada e jogos de role-playing — e se interessa por Portugal ou fala e lê português — talvez goste da minha revista recém-lançada, Notícias de Pfandom. Já foram publicadas duas edições e a publicação será mensal.

Edição número um (maio de 2026)

Edição número dois (junho de 2026)

O meu co-editor neste projecto é Álvaro de Sousa Holstein, que publicou a primeira revista de ficção científica em Portugal em 1983. O seu artigo, "Science Fiction and Fantasy in Portugal", que publiquei em tradução na The Stf Amateur #3, teve uma influência formativa na minha compreensão inicial da história destes géneros no país. O artigo oferece um contexto útil.

E se quiser receber as Notícias de Pfandom regularmente, basta dizer-me e eu adiciono-o à lista de distribuição.

Friday, June 03, 2022

LOC for Vita Transplantare #26

The following is a letter of comment sent to John Nielsen Hall, editor of Vita Transplantare, commenting on #26.

Dear Mr. Hall:

I am sorry to hear about your recent personal and information technology-related battles that stood strong between you and the completion of Vita Transplantare #26, my first introduction to your journal of opinion, reviews, and diatribes pertaining to your thought process. I can empathize with the need for a new laptop. My home office was recently burgled, as detailed in my APA-L apazine Telegraphs & Tar Pits #16 (https://efanzines.com/HR/)—so I understand how unnerving it can be to be between machines. It was surprisingly uncomfortable.

It strikes me that your perzine is largely composed of a letter column. How wonderful! I enjoyed your and Fred Lerner’s (and later, Graham Charnock’s) dueling commentary on Arthur Ransome’s Swallows and Amazons, which I haven’t read. I can understand your point of view given that you didn’t have similar experience camping or hiking, but the Eagle Scout and Scout leader in me was intrigued enough by the book to add it to The List (along with Station Eleven and Life After Life). Mr. Lerner’s remark that Ransome’s book didn’t include any characters of African or Indian ancestry reminded me of a recent read of Victor Appleton’s Tom Swift and His Motor-Cycle—my first read of Swift. Appleton’s portrayal of the character Eradicate Andrew Jackson Abraham Lincoln Sampson was impressively shocking and inappropriate. While I realize that it was of the time—the book was initially published in 1910—it’s challenging at this late date to imagine that such a portrayal was OK, particularly in children’s fiction. Ernest Hogan offers a thought-provoking take on the book in his 2016 La Bloga blog entry, “Chicanonautica: Tom Swift and His Old-Fashioned Racism.” (https://tinyurl.com/swift-racism)

Gary Mattingly’s letter of comment is structured suggestive of apa comments; is Vita Transplantare an apazine, perchance? It seems as though Mattingly was a Scout in Illinois; I participated in Wisconsin as a youth. Our troop also played Capture the Flag, which is different from British Bulldog, during campouts and outdoor activities, and some of my fondest memories are of the wintertime Klondike Derby. That was a day-long outdoors activity during which patrols competed in a number of outdoor events, making their way around a course with a large sled containing all the equipment needed for the day. Each Scout brought a can of soup as part of their participation, and the afternoon meal consisted of a soup comprising all those different cans of soup… perhaps a hundred cans of soup. Sounds like a disgusting mess, but it was hot, and it was delicious—as far as memory serves. One summer, while working as staff at a local Scout camp, I ensconced myself well up a tree during a campwide game of Capture the Flag to read Douglas Adams’s novel Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency. I read the entire book while up that tree, returning to the dining hall well after sunset—and well after the other Scouts. I had not been caught, but I also didn’t win. Surely, I hadn’t been playing correctly. It was a very good book.

The remarks on video blogs brought to mind Rob Imes’s analysis of changes in YouTube over time in Fadeaway #67. In that piece, Imes walks through a wide range of notable fandom-related online video content that might be of interest to you and your readers. Your faint praise of Star Trek: Picard—”It's a good thing to watch just before bed.”—made me chuckle. I’ve yet to watch it, but I’ve been enjoying Star Trek: Discovery in a protracted fashion and quite liked the first 15 minutes of Star Trek: Strange New Worlds I watched during lunch a week or so ago. In addition to the multiple book and movie references, I found the music recommendations intriguing. Having just read The Drink Tank #438 (basically a Beatles fanzine) and recently discovering Nic Farey’s “Radio Winston” pieces in This Here…, music in fandom has become front of mind somehow. Soul Glo, Combo Chimbita, Widowspeak, Nia Archives… all playlist bound.

Why would John Thiel buy Facebook? (Just kidding.)

I trust that the last two pages of the letterzine are you and you alone in terms of writing. All in all, a good introduction to your perzine, which is worth returning to. Thank you for publishing. I appreciate the numerous book, movie, and television suggestions, as well as the lively discussion.

Hope this finds you and yours well. Have a good weekend!

LOC for Ray X X-Rayer #164

The following is a letter of comment sent to Ray Palm, editor of Ray X X-Rayer, commenting on #164.

Dear Mr. Palm:

It seems entirely plausible and likely to me that the Men in Black might develop skin conditions. Regardless of whether they’re merely quasi-government agents trying to quell discussion of unidentified flying objects and related phenomena or the cinema-styled front line against alien incursions, it’s reasonable to think that they’d regularly be exposed to communicable diseases, viruses, and other potential illnesses. I know that were I employed suchly, I’d at least experience exacerbated eczema or break out in mild hives from the on-the-job stress alone. So I’m not all that surprised you had to touch up the skin of your Mr. Man in Black in the opener to Ray X X-Rayer #164.

Small world smaller, it was a pleasant surprise to see you invoke Fred Argoff, similar to a recent mention by Mark Strickert in MarkTime #140. Argoff’s zines Watch the Closing Doors and Brooklyn! are both well worth seeking out. I miss him and his zines almost more than I miss Brooklyn itself. What a gift it must have been to receive that transit token. I’m glad you valued it enough to keep it, to photograph it—and to share the results. A token of his and your appreciation, if you will.

My son and I also watched Spider-Man: No Way Home—perhaps enjoying it more than you did. My son remarked that online scuttlebutt was that the movies’ writers cram so many villains and crossover superheroes into the Spider-Man films because Tom Holland isn’t strong enough to carry the movies on his own. I suppose that could be true, but I’ve long wondered why the makers of superhero cinema try to cram so much into the movies generally. Pace them a little more slowly, spread them out a little bit… let them breathe. Why force a multi-issue storyline or extended arc into one movie if you don’t have to? Comic books are by design and nature episodic. The movies could be, too. And sometimes I feel like they’re trying to do too much. Having recently rewatched half—the first half—of Captain America: The First Avenger, it’s clear that they don’t have to. One hero, one villain, one origin story. In and out, like a surgical strike.

It was also fun to see the letters of comment from Lloyd Penney and Fred Wright, who also reconnected with me on the publication of his new novel. Like Argoff, Wright is another correspondent and friend I met through zines before I got involved in sf fandom and its fanzines.

I hope that this letter finds you and yours well. This was my first exposure to Ray X X-Rayer, and I’ll be sure to return. Short, sweet, and interesting.

LOC for The Drink Tank #438

The following is a letter of comment sent to Christopher J. Garcia, editor of The Drink Tank, commenting on #438.

Dear Mr. Garcia:

It feels a little lame to admit it, but I love music. I’ve played music: the alto, soprano, and tenor saxophones; and singing in a punk rock band called the Anchormen; we put out three CDs and were part of an arts collective in the Boston area. (I was also in another band called the Trylons, but we never got out of the rehearsal room.) I’ve volunteered as a DJ for WNUR-FM and WMFO-FM. I listen to music almost daily and make near-weekly playlists (https://tinyurl.com/HR-playlists). Sometimes it’s challenging to find dedicated listening time given my work and family responsibilities, but I gather every week with friends for a two-hour shared DJ session using JQBX (“Conference of the Birds”), and I just started hanging out with friends in Turntable.fm (“WTAF”).

I’ve even published music fanzines—specifically, punk rock fanzines, dating back to 1988 when I first came across Maximum Rocknroll and published my first music zine, No Drama, while still in high school. I’ve reviewed records for Bad Transfer and Tail Spins. I reviewed shows for SonicNet back in the day. And I contribute book and magazine reviews to Ugly Things magazine. So I love it—adore it—when my interest and pleasure in music intersects with sf and other fandom activities. (Even though I’ve yet to dip toe into the filk scene yet.) Drink Tank #438 was a pleasant surprise. (Nic Farey’s “Radio Winston” pieces in This Here… are another welcome overlap, to be sure.)

All that to say, good work, you—and your contributors—on an issue that was surprisingly fun to read. Why surprisingly? I mean, I enjoy the Beatles. But I’m far from the biggest fan; they’re not even a band I’m that interested in. (Though I am more so now, thanks to you lot.) My folks, though they were in their 20s during the band’s heyday, largely missed the Beatles during college in the Midwest, believe it or not, so I grew up listening to Abba, bluegrass, and Frankie Laine.) Yet I found the appreciation, enthusiasm, and nostalgia for the Fab Four infectious and found myself reading with attention riveted. Not only is the ish rich fodder for playlist making (Your “My Top Nine Beatles Songs,” John Purcell’s “Playing Song Games with the Beatles,” and Julian West’s in-depth analysis “You’ve Got to Hide Your Love Away”), I thrilled to the memories contributors shared about how they first discovered and listened to the Beatles, be it on television, on the radio, or on Beatles 45s and albums themselves.

In Los Angeles alone, there are two weekly Beatles programs on the radio. Saturday with the Beatles airs Saturdays from 10 a.m. to 12 p.m. PT on KCSN-FM, and Breakfast with the Beatles airs Sunday from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. PT on KLOS-FM. That’s at least five hours of Beatles music broadcast weekly! And if you throw in the Dylan Hours program Sundays from 9-11 a.m. PT on KCSN-FM, fen of that era of music can veritably plotz with listening pleasure.

The media geek in me also enjoyed your consideration of tape music in “‘Revolution 9’: The Best of the Beatles,” as well as Chuck Serface’s “Recent Comics Inspired by the Beatles.” But Tassoula Kokkoris’s “For the Benefit of Mr. Fanque” might be my favorite piece in the issue because of its historical exploration of what might have otherwise been lyrical minutiae.

The issue included plenty of fannish interest related to the band. If there was anything missing—which I’m not really daring to speculate—it would’ve been more close-knit parallels with sf fandom: science-fictional mentions of or references to the band; Beatles fanzines such as The 910, Beatles Unlimited, Good Day Sunshine, and The Write Thing; even Merseybeat fan fiction, if any such exists, similar to Haruki Murakami’s speculative jazz fiction “Charlie Parker Plays Bossa Nova,” which imagines the track list and personnel for a recording that doesn’t exist.

It was a rare fanzine that I finished reading with several article ideas that I would have liked to contribute to that very issue of the zine I just read. It was kind of a fun sensation, almost an incipient retroactive slush pile. Time travel of a sort while reading, with the music of the past asserting itself strongly in the present, and then me wanting to go back in time just a little bit so I could have been part of it. While listening to the Beatles, no less. And me saying I’m not much of a Beatles fan. 

I’ve been hypmotized.

Hope you and yours are doing well. Looking forward to future issues.

Tuesday, May 31, 2022

Book Review: "The Politics of Fandom" by Hannah Mueller

The Politics of Fandom by Hannah Mueller (McFarland, 2022)

If you recently read Jeffrey Redmond’s article “Politics in Science Fiction” in Ionisphere #34 or my piece “Fanatiquette: The ‘New’ Fan Etiquette,” you might also be intrigued by this book, published just this year. Originally offered as a dissertation at Cornell University, the book explores in depth the kinds of conflicts that can threaten and sometimes unify the various people and communities involved in fandom.

Similar to most recent fandom studies texts, the book distinguishes between literary or affirmational fandom (those who like to read and publish fanzines) and media or transformative fandom (those who like to watch and create). (I know that’s an oversimplification, but I’m suspicious that transformative fan terms are mostly used by transformative fen and academics. Affirmational fen have an opportunity to discover new forms of fan activity and new ways to communicate.) The book, written by the managing editor of Diacritics, considers both types of fandom through a transformative lens and offers several ideas for those interested in bridging the older generations of fen and newer, younger fen. Those opportunities for bridge building are welcome and inspiring to at least this fan, who increasingly feels at home in both camps.

Over the course of the book, Mueller considers a handful of case studies offered as instructive examples of political conflicts dating back to the earliest days of fandom. In fact, there are at least two issues of Tightbeam included among the citations, as well as Donald Franson’s 1962 N3F Fandbook Some Historical Facts About Science Fiction Fandom. The N3F also shows up in the index.

The conflicts considered by Mueller include the Great Exclusion of 1939, in which the Worldcon organizing committee ostracized politically outspoken participants. That con lobby skirmish led to the formation of New Fandom and eventually the National Fantasy Fan Federation. Mueller does well to compare the two groups’ approaches to considering the role of politics in sf, fantasy, and horror. She also considers the Breen Boondoggle in 1964, in which fen decided to exclude Marion Zimmer Bradley’s husband Walter Breen from Pacificon II and the Fantasy Amateur Press Association (or its wait list, at least). While less explicitly political in nature, that controversy again highlighted aspects of inclusivity and exclusivity in fandom, focusing on how adults interact with children in fannish and other settings.

The book then fast forwards to several more recent political movements within fandom, including RaceFail ‘09, which took place primarily on LiveJournal rather than in fanzines—highlighting transformative fandom’s move online to platforms such as fan fiction repository Archive of Our Own—in which fen and professionals alike considered the role of race (and by extension, the working class, the poor, and women) in literature and media, as well as within fandom itself. Of special note in this chapter is Mueller’s consideration of fan-pro relationships and the role of authority, hierarchy, and power in political conflict within fandom. While several newly popular authors have emerged from RaceFail, the pros challenged at the time didn’t necessarily hold their own with grace and charm.

Also considered in the text: Puppygate and its impact on Hugo voting; how an influx of Twilight fen affected cons and fandom; the role of cosplay and other transformative fan activities; Glee fen and their criticism of the television show when it started to stray from topics and themes that initially attracted fen; and the transmedia marketing of The Hunger Games, which enabled fen to participate on both sides of the novels’—and movies’—narrative politics, introducing questions about and concerns with the commercial aspects of fan activity.

All in all, Mueller does well to examine the cohesion of community and ideals of tolerance within fandom, the tensions between hierarchical organization models and looser online networks of fen, and the desire for entertainment as well as social change. “[T]ransformative fans are starting to appear as equal to, and in some ways even more influential than the affirmational fans of literary science fiction and fantasy,” Mueller wrote. “[T]he divide between politically progressive and politically conservative fractions of fandom has in fact deepened once more, and the feuds that are carried out between different camps in the fannish sphere are more directly and openly connected to national and global political developments than perhaps ever before in fandom history.”

What’s missing in the book, through no fault of the text itself, is a solution—or solutions. One of the things that struck me is that requests to not discuss politics in fannish spaces are often arguments for the continuation of traditional politics, even if not positioned explicitly as such. Perhaps it’s not whether we talk about politics in fandom but how we do so. This book is a lively, wide-ranging first step toward finding such solutions.

Friday, May 20, 2022

LOC for MT Void #2220-2223

The following is a letter of comment sent to Mark and Evelyn Leeper, editors of MT Void, commenting on #2220-2223.

Dear Mr. and Mrs. Leeper:

Having recently received several new issues of MT Void via the National Fantasy Fan Federation’s franking service—and having had a letter of column printed and even responded to by a fellow reader (Hello, R. Looney!)—I see fit to write again after reading #2220-2223.

The reprint and discussion of Dale Skran's review of Motherland: Fort Salem is intriguing. Given the current anti-woman and anti-reproduction rights leaning in the United States, I’m not sure if I’d enjoy the television program right now, but I did recently read Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale. Perhaps the fantastic elements of the show will dull the parallels sufficiently. Last weekend, my wife and I participated in a reproductive rights rally in downtown Los Angeles. We definitely don’t need another witch hunt right now. Skran’s review also reminded me slightly of The Nevers, which is streaming broadly—and an excellent television program. Have you watched The Nevers? You and Mr. Skran might also get a kick out of the Image comic book limited series Man-Eaters: The Cursed. Its precursor (Man-Eaters) was an amazing story, and the subsequent miniseries quite good as well, swinging the title’s attention from women as lycanthropes to witchcraft.

I also recently read John Scalzi’s The Kaiju Preservation Society and appreciated Joe Karpierz’s review. My review appeared in The N3F Review of BooksApril 2022 issue. I read it, while Karpierz listened to it, but I can imagine how enjoyable Wil Wheaton’s narration must have been. Very cool.

The reviews of relevant movies recently aired on Turner Classic Movies were welcome—but I wish I’d been aware of their scheduling beforehand so I could watch them, too! I’ll have to pay more attention to their schedule. I usually do in October for their active classic horror lineup leading up to Halloween. Maybe it’s something my alter ego Cathode Ray could work into his “Celluloid Sentience” movie and DVD release column for FanActivity Gazette. Not a bad idea, and one for which I thank you. (As a side note, I’ve been enjoying the MT Void mini-reviews that Philip De Parto circulates to the The Science Fiction Association of Bergen County. Another pleasant surprise in my in box!) 

Karpierz’s review of Kimberly Unger’s The Extractionist doth compel, but the book isn’t even out yet! (Now, that’s science fiction for you.) The reviewer, lucky fellow that he is, must have received an advance reading copy. Evelyn’s consideration of Arthur Conan Doyle’s “​​A Study in Scarlet” was also inspiring. I’m curious whether you’re active in Mrs. Hudson's Cliffdwellers or The Priory Scholars of NYC. It looks like The Sherlock Breakfast Club in Los Angeles hasn’t met since 2017, but The Curious Collectors Of Baker Street are still active. Thanks for the inadvertent nudge!

And I found Skran’s “Reforming the Short Form Hugo” of high interest. The N3F and its directorate has been having a similar discussion about the categories and approach to nominees for the National Fantasy Fan Federation Speculative Fiction Awards, or Neffy Awards, which while not as notable or visible, still run slightly parallel. I agree with Skran’s proposal: a Dramatic series Hugo focusing on series from the last year. We could even take some cues from the Emmy Awards, which offers useful precedent. My preference—for the Neffy Awards at least—is to focus on shows that premiered during the previous year. But my Neffy thinking hasn’t gone further than that. For the Hugos, the Emmys’ attention to any six eligible episodes for final-round judging might be a useful standard. Skran’s three is also a reasonable number.

The Emmys also concentrate on episode length. They consider Short Form series as having episodes with an average running time of two to 20 minutes, Half-hour series as 20-40 minute episodes, and Hour-long series as 40-75 minute episodes. Taking that approach could still allow room for other shorter-form content. And I think Skran’s general concern about the Hugo category being potentially biased toward large streaming platforms (or network or cable TV, for that matter) has merit. The N3F Directorate has had similar conversations about conventionally published, print-on-demand, and self-published books. I’d advocate for breaking them all out and including them all, while we currently lump them all together and have a slight bias against conventionally published books in some quarters.

But why I’m really writing to you is because I read Catherynne M. Valente’s Comfort Me With Apples last night. I’d requested the ebook from my local library, missed the first hold release, and wanted to jump on the subsequent hold release. So I read it in one sitting lest my 21 days pass uneventfully. What an absolutely wonderful and surprising read. Thank you, Mr. Karpierz, for recommending it. Given my remarks in the letter of comment in #2221, it did not end up being the book I was expecting. Though it was wholly unlike The Cabin at the End of the World, The Couple Next Door, or Lying in Wait—though still a domestic thriller—it was even better than I’d imagined. More along the lines of Ira Levin’s The Stepford Wives reimagined by Neil Gaiman. I’m not sure what Looney would make of it. The Comfort Me With Apples he mentioned (by Peter DeVries) is described as “a laugh-out-loud novel about teenage pretensions and adult delusions from an author whom the New York Times has called ‘a Balzac of the station wagon set.’” Valente’s book, a serious doozy of a read, is not that comic, for sure. Instead, it is darkly fantastic, mundane and mythic in its scope, and subtly shocking at times. I would not have read it were it not for MT Void. Thank you.

I hope you and yours are well.

LOC for Alexiad Vol. 21 #2

The following is a letter of comment sent to Lisa and Joseph Major, editors of Alexiad, commenting on Vol. 21 #2.

Dear Mr. and Mrs. Major:

Last night, I read Alexiad Vol. 21 #2—which I received through the National Fantasy Fan Federation’s franking service—and wanted to drop you a brief note to wish you well. It’s overcast and cool in southern California today, downright gray, and my neighbors are doing some construction work, so my home office is full of the sounds of hammers, power tools, and Mexican radio. I don’t mind the radio. And I’m thankful it’s Friday.

I remember seeing an issue of Alexiad previously. I’m not sure if I printed it out at work to read or if you mailed it to me, but it was definitely a hard copy, so if I’ve been remiss on responding to a mailing, I apologize. I am also sorry that you have been not entirely well and harassed by other issues. Things have been slightly heavy here, too, with family concerns, work challenges, and world affairs over the last few weeks.

My wife and I enjoyed the recent lunar eclipse and plan on traveling to see the 2024 solar eclipse somewhere in the Midwest. Our son went on a camping road trip with the Scouts in 2017. I was unable to join the troop because of work commitments and regret not being able to participate. He had a grand adventure by all accounts.

Your review of Moira Greyland’s memoir The Last Closet interested me. I, too, read it not that long ago—and I’d been unaware of the scandal when it came to light in 2014. (My review is in the March 2022 edition of The N3F Review of Books and is also available on my blog.) Your commentary focused more on issues I didn’t address, and I found your point of view thought provoking. Vox Day’s involvement in the publication of the book definitely lends a political purpose to the book, and I was disappointed by Greyland’s conflation of child sexual abuse with homosexuality—though I have never experienced anything like what Greyland survived and I can only empathize. It was, after all, her traumatic experience.

While I agree with the idea of not kicking someone when they’re down—or dead—I’m not sure how compelling I find the argument that Marion Zimmer Bradley and Walter Breen can no longer defend themselves. Do they need to? Breen’s penchant for abuse—and his fate—were determined before his death. And while Bradley wasn’t found guilty of a crime, necessarily, her and Elisabeth Waters’s depositions make for concerning, if not alarming, reading. If we can accept their depositions at face value, if any of the claimants involved are reliable narrators—Greyland included—Bradley didn’t really actually counter any of her daughter’s claims; instead, she merely claimed that she didn’t know any of it had happened until well after the fact. And Waters’s deposition seems to bolster and confirm Greyland’s claims.

In any event, it is definitely a series of unfortunate events, and my heart goes out to Greyland—even if I think it’s incorrect to place the blame on her parents’ sexual identity or orientation. This is just one study, but C. Jenny, T.A. Roesler, and K.L. Poyer’s “Are children at risk for sexual abuse by homosexuals?” (Pediatrics. 1994 Jul;94[1]:41-4) suggests that the risk of children being abused by homosexual adults ranges between 0% to 3.1%. Meanwhile, in 82% of the cases in that study, the alleged offender was a heterosexual partner of a close relative of the child. Given the changing makeup of families over time, more recent studies might need to be done to better assess the likelihood of a parent or partner abusing a child, regardless of their sexual orientation. But the case doesn’t seem strong enough to suggest that all (or even most or much) LGBTQ+ parents are likely to abuse, much less that all parents are.

The earlier Breendoggle was paired with the Great Exclusion of 1939 for consideration in Hannah Mueller’s The Politics of Fandom (McFarland, 2022), which I also recently read and reviewed for the N3F Review. So I was momentarily thrown by your subsequent comments on Tom Veal’s Igor's Campaign: A Tale of Ambition. I had to laugh out loud when I realized it was an alternate history! The ebook might make a fun parallel read with Andy Hooper and Carrie Root’s “Read and Enjoyed, but No Content” play script reprints in Captain Flashback. I’ve ordered it and will let you know what I think.

Your comments on the Worldcon bids are poignant: “Some argued that old writers who weren’t being read any more had no appeal to the contemporary crowd. Others regretted the end of an era where one could mix with those who had made the field.” Makes me wonder, though: Who makes up the contemporary crowd? Yes, there’s a generational shift in fandom underway. It’s been going on for some time, at least since the advent of Star Trek and the resultant media fandom, exacerbated by so much of communication’s move online and the shift away from fanzines and more traditional correspondence culture. Then there’s the more recent shift to mainstream pop culture cons rather than fannish cons. (I would love to read the model railroading and rail fanning story you remember—I do not know what it is, either. Perhaps Dale Speirs of Opuntia knows? Sounds like something he’d come across.)

But there’s got to be room for everyone, regardless of whether you’re a literary fan or a media fan, an offline fan or an online fan, or a fandom studies academic’s vision of an affirmational fan or transformative fan. Do we need to jettison the past to move into the future? Or can we bring our history with us and leave room for the old and the new, contemporaneously? Ghods, I hope so.

I wish you and your wife well, in happiness and in health. The Los Angeles Science Fantasy Society recently lost member Karl Lembke to cancer, so the mortality of fen is foremost in mind. Hopefully we can avoid the mortality of fandom itself.


Thursday, May 19, 2022

LOC for Captain Flashback #41

The following is a letter of comment sent to Andy Hooper and Carrie Root, editors of Captain Flashback, commenting on #41.

Dear Mx. Hooper and Root:

More than a decade ago, I compiled a directory of then-active apae, first titled Active APAs and then Blue Moon Special. They are available at https://efanzines.com/ActiveAPAs/. And while I fall far, far short of any kind of comprehensive expert on current apae, I had never, ever, ever heard about the Turbo-Charged Party-Animal Amateur Press Association. I’m still not sure whether it exists, though Fancyclopedia 3 also suggests that it does.

Perhaps in part influenced by Captain Flashback #41’s “Read and Enjoyed, but No Content” (Chapter Eight of a Serial Play about APAs), reading the issue was a surreal and surprisingly fun experience. Truth be told, I took much of it, even “Comments on Turbo-Apa #429” as fiction. My first experience reading your fanzine felt like reading an old issue of Farm Pulp, almost a glimpse into a parallel universe in which there were also apae and fanzines, just not… the ones with which I was familiar or even aware. It was a fun, fun read.

The opening piece, “Looking for a Good Ship,” was the most familiar and least alien writing: book reviews grouped under a theme. I recently started compiling an sf club news column for the National Fantasy Fan Federation’s newszine, FanActivity Gazette; I would love to learn more about the Science Fiction Without Borders discussion group in Madison. I’ll include the current ish of Fanac Gazette when I send this letter of comment, and if the group is interested in sending some recent and upcoming news, I’d love to include it in the roundup. In your review roundup, you mentioned several recent and older titles that I’ll have to add to my reading list, and I appreciated the focus on spaceflight and ships as settings for storytelling.

“Read and Enjoyed, but No Content” took my breath away. I cannot wait to read the whole thing. The fen in the audience who got to witness the staging at Corflu 22 are lucky ducks. I really got a kick out of the combination of apae elements and dialogue, and look forward to reading the preceding chapters. The character names, apae elements, and content—which I read and enjoyed—put me in a fugue state of sorts. What a wonderful idea.

Influenced by that piece, my first read of “Mailing Comments on Turbo-APA #429” struck me in a similar vein. I read on, presuming that—similar to the play script or transcript preceding it—the names, titles, and content were also fictional, perhaps blending in actual fannish commentary. While I am still not entirely sure what is factual and real in Captain Flashback, I love the idea of doing a fictional apa featuring fictional participants, fictional commentary, a fictional fandom, a fictional genre, and fictional resultant drama. Such a rich idea. Despite that fugue state and surreal intrigue, I’ve since reread your commentary as (f)actual comments. After all, Madison is a real city. A real Mad City, in fact. (I grew up in Wisconsin; my parents still live near Madison.) So kudos to you two. I’m still not sure what is real.

As a member of the N3F since 2008 or 2009, former editor of The National Fantasy Fan (the 2009-2011 issues, the closest I’ve come to a genzine in sf fandom), and the N3F’s current chair, I appreciated and enjoyed Jerry Kaufman’s letter of comment, as well as your response. “[M]any fans thought the N3F was a good idea when it started,” Kaufman wrote. And while I might disagree with your reply—“[T]he N3F continues to be valuable today, as a place where people who need a title can go to find one.”—folks’ mileage might vary. I actually get a kick out of the occasional N3F jabs, japes, and jokes even as a member. It inspires me do more, and to do better.

Since finding sf fandom by way of comic books and punk rock fanzines, most of my fan activity has been through the N3F—my editing The Fan as a borderline prozine, paying cover artists and fiction authors for their submissions, being a highlight. Even though I still actively contribute to the N3F clubzines and chair the Directorate, I’m also a member of LASFS (I just dialed in to the weekly meeting) and contribute to APA-L and LASFAPA. Regardless, I realize I’m no Damon Knight, Forrest J Ackerman, Ray Bradbury, or Bjo Trimble. I still enjoy the straight line to history, as well as the creative outlet, friends (some of whom have drifted off, and some of whom drift back), and fun my involvement has brought. And I quite like the idea of the N3F—or a national club, going back to the original vision—serving to help to bridge other fanac (apae, local clubs, etc.) for those fen who find that interesting and useful.

Again, your mileage might vary.

I look forward to future issues of Captain Flashback, as well as future apa comments, fictional or factual. I love it when I come across new (to me), still active apae. Huzzah to the participants of the Turbo-Charged Party-Animal Amateur Press Association!

LOC for MarkTime #140

The following is a letter of comment sent to Mark Strickert, editor of MarkTime, commenting on #140.

Dear Mr. Strickert:

Last night’s reading was my first exposure to your fanzine MarkTime, and I wanted to write a letter of hello and how do you do. Rialto’s not too far away from me in the Los Angeles area, but the closest I’ve found myself to you is in San Bernardino while on my way up into the mountains to a Scout camp near Lake Arrowhead. It’s good to know there’s a fellow fan and fanzine guy out that way! I enjoyed MarkTime’s mix of personal, travel, and public transit commentary.

I am glad your son has been able to avail himself of punk and hard rock records and T-shirts at local record stores such as Amoeba, Doctor Strange, and Penny Lane Records. If you ever find yourself in Fullerton and other parts Orange County, I’d check out Black Hole Records, Radiation Records (great for punk, hardcore, and metal), Left of the Dial Records, and White Rabbit Music (formerly Burger Records). And closer to west LA, I enjoy Headline Records (also great for punk and hardcore), Record Surplus, and Timewarp Records.

While you were in Portland, I’m glad you got to stop by Powell’s Books and Microcosm Publishing. And even though you felt your acquisition of The Zinester’s Guide to Portland would have been welcome earlier, I’m glad you picked it up—as well as Xerography Debt, which has reviewed some of my non-sf zines over the years. You should consider sending in MarkTime for review! (Some of my online writing was included in Microcosm’s Zinester's Guide to NYC, courtesy of Ayun Halliday, who does a great little minicomic/zine titled The East Village Inky, which is also worth checking out.) I love it when my involvement in sf and other zines intersects.

Your transit riding and rail fanning in Oceanside, Carlsbad, and San Diego made me slightly jealous. I need to do more of that. I am not at all surprised to see Fred Argoff of Brooklyn! zine fame in your letter column. He’s published some of my non-sf writing, as well. Worlds collide.

Argoff’s August 2021 letter of comment resonated with me. Even though I only lived in New York City briefly, I was more of a Mets fan than a Yankees fan, and since moving to southern California, I’ve been hard pressed to find a baseball team to follow actively—largely because of the Dodgers’ relocation, which far predated my time in Brooklyn. The closest I’ve come is minor league, specifically the Rancho Cucamonga Quakes out your way, but this year I’m trying to remain aware of the Angels. My attention has already drifted. It was also fun seeing missives from John Hertz, a fellow LASFS and APA-L member, and Lloyd Penney, whose letterhacking I can only aspire to.

Your mention of Retro TV reminded me of MeTV, which I watch on cable, and Pluto TV, which I watch online, as well as on our smart TV. Using the pseudonym Cathode Ray, I write a television column for the National Fantasy Fan Federation’s FanActivity Gazette newszine called “Rabid Ears.” You might get a kick out of it. I’ll send you the most recent edition with this LOC.

Well, that’s all for now. Plenty of overlapping interests, and I look forward to future issues. Next time you come to west LA to walk along the now-vacant cable car corridors, let me know.


LOC for Spartacus #55

The following is a letter of comment sent to Guy Lillian, editor of Spartacus, commenting on #55.

Dear Mr. Lillian:

I recently read a recent issue of your perzine, Spartacus #55, and in an effort to develop the habit of writing more letters of comment, here’s a brief missive. I hope that my correspondence finds you and yours happy and healthy.

I enjoyed reading about your recent travels to Paris, London, and Edinburgh. I am especially glad you were able to see the Mona Lisa up close and personal. The last time I visited the Louvre, with my wife while visiting friends, we saw it the way you described it from video: "crammed shoulder to shoulder, belly to belly with tourists." It was still meaningful and worthwhile, though I envy your prolonged exposure. You also reminded me of my brief time in Edinburgh, perhaps more than two decades ago. Most of what I remember is mist and cool and stonework. A beautiful city redolent of atmosphere and the weight of history.

Given Lloyd Penney and Rich Lynch’s letters of comment, I seem to have missed a lively discussion of Vladimir Putin and the war in Ukraine. I shall have to explore back issues, perhaps. I am heartened by—and encourage—discussion of world events in fanzines such as yours. Avoiding political conversation doesn’t seem to be a viable solution to the situations in which we find ourselves. With the recent shooting in Buffalo, I think we’re already seeing the expected outcome of the Kyle Rittenhouse trial.

Your inclusion of William O. Douglas’s concurring decision in Roe v. Wade made for interesting parallel reading. And I think the Supreme Court leak, draft opinion, Buffalo shooting, and Rittenhouse are unfortunately interconnected. Not only could overturning Roe v. Wade lead to the erosion of other personal rights for women, LGBTQ+ people, and people of color, but participating in a reproductive rights rally this past weekend with my wife, I was also mindful of the increasing enabling of far right and police state violence against peaceful protesters, as well as the dearth of media coverage of such protests, while smaller events held by the far right seem to draw more attention. I was also mindful of the chilling effect such violence—police or otherwise—can have on peaceful protest. There are days I wish we lived in less interesting times, and as a person of some privilege, I am aware that many others feel the weight of such issues even more heavily. Empathy is increasingly needed. As is direct talk about just what extreme rightists are afraid of and fighting for—or fighting against. We need to be able to address that explicitly.

But the concerns about privacy writ large are also compelling and concerning—and would affect all people, regardless of gender, race, or sexual identity or preference—presuming any shifts in privacy protections are applied equitably. That’s one of the most challenging aspects of events in recent years: the uneven application of law, largely based on class and race, and the lessening recognition and strength of what we’ve already agreed to in terms of community, legislative, and procedural standards. There’s a difference between changing our societal mind based on new knowledge or modern attitudes, and disregarding standing rule of law to increasingly protect the interests of a growing minority, imposing those interests on—and removing existing rights of—the larger collective.

Having recently read Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale for the first time, I am curious whether you’re aware of other books that address similar issues: reproduction rights, bodily autonomy and integrity, privacy, religious fascism, and political violence.

Thank you for such a thought-provoking issue. I look forward to exploring future editions of Spartacus.

Book Review: "Fandom: Confidential" by Ron Frantz

Fandom: Confidential by Ron Frantz (Midguard, 2000)

This memoir details a portion of comic book fandom with which I was unfamiliar. While I recognized some of the names and fanzines involved (The Rocket’s Blast–Comicollector!), the bulk of the story takes place in the mid-1970s and involves an organization I didn’t even know existed. Regardless, it’s a fascinating read and is relevant to this day.

Frantz, the author, wrote the book between 1978-1980 before setting it aside for almost two decades, eventually returning to it about 20 years ago. At the time, the story he wanted to tell was still somewhat painful, perhaps political, and certainly controversial. When the book was finally finished and published, the memories were slightly less painful and likely to raise a ruckus among still-active fen.

Before the advent of eBay and other fandom sales platforms, buying, selling, and trading comic books through the mail was a potentially risky endeavor. You didn’t know who someone was. You didn’t know whether they actually possessed what you thought you were buying. And there was little recourse for deals gone wrong. (Some might say that that is still the case even with eBay!)

A man named Stanley Blair founded comic book fandom’s first adzine and first trade association to help buyers and sellers engage in their trade with greater competence and confidence. The adzine, Stan’s Weekly Express (WE), launched in 1969 to help network the business side of comics fandom. During its first year, Blair developed a mailing list of almost 20,000 nostalgia collectors.The WE Reporting Bureau (WRB) helped record, report, investigate, and persecute mail fraud within the hobby. And the WE Seal of Approval (WSA) helped identify which buyers, sellers, and other tradesmen–and women–were trustworthy and worthy of business. Its logo–and a seller’s WSA number–was intended as a badge of honor. 

Like the National Fantasy Fan Federation, WE, the WRB, and the WSA were an attempt to organize fandom, to connect practitioners of a hobby and business, and to establish group norms and standards for their interactions. (The N3F even merits a definition in the book’s “Fandom Glossary.”) Similar to sf and fantasy fandom, comics fandom faced its own challenges. Frantz served as administrator of the WSA for more than two years, and his book is a wide-ranging exploration of comic book history, comics fandom, the rise and fall of the WSA, and other developments in the hobby. Not all of it is rosy.

Given the nature of comics fandom, Frantz focuses more on collecting and the commercial side of things than sf and fantasy fans might, generally. Literary and media fen aren’t necessarily collectors in the same way as hardcore comics fen might be. Regardless, there’s a lot of interest adjacent to sf fandom. Frantz briefly retells the history of comic books, its fanzines, and fandom, drawing parallels to other modes of publishing that yielded their own fandom under the umbrella of nostalgia fandom (pulp magazines, old-time radio, and the like).

He considers the history and controversies surrounding the first comic book price guides–and the impact they had on the hobby. He considers the development of local comics fan clubs such as the Oklahoma Alliance of Fans. He looks at the evolution of The Nostalgia Journal into The Comics Journal, as well as The Buyer’s Guide for Comic Fandom into The Comics Buyer’s Guide. He details the controversial introduction of Fandom Directory, which continues to this day online. And he looks at the occasional collisions comics fandom experienced with other forms.

Along those lines, Frantz takes a look at the impact that the emergence of media fandom and Star Trek had on the nostalgia and collectibles trade. As the television show and its resulting fandom grew in popularity, fen began buying and selling collectibles related to the program, occasionally drawing the attention of the WSA and its mail fraud division. In 1976, for example, 25 percent of the mail fraud cases under investigation by the WRB involved Star Trek fen. 

In several cases, members of the Star Trek Welcommittee itself even got involved in an attempt to hamper investigations. People operating the Star Trek Association for Revival weren’t honoring paid memberships, and Welcommittee members operated individual chapters of STAR. A fan club for Nichelle Nichols became unable to meet its obligations to members, in part because of a printing imbroglio involving the Welcommittee newsletter and a misplaced contract. And a member of the Welcommittee misrepresented himself as a friend of Isaac Asimov while corresponding with a young writer, encouraging her to write stories of a sexual nature for a supposed anthology and asking her to share a hotel room during a con. The results of that investigation were published in a number of Star Trek fanzines, attracting the ire of the Welcommittee.

While the fan feud stories make for juicy reading, the book remains largely the tale of WE, the WRB, and the WSA. Its rise and fall also make for juicy reading. While the worthy business it undertook is notable, so is its own experience with internal divisions, personality conflicts, and controversy. To quote Depeche Mode, “People are people, so why should it be you and I should get along so awfully?” Frantz himself offers a clue: “Historically, science fiction and comic book fans have difficulty seeing eye to eye.” That can be true even within one specific fandom. “[M]any people forget why they became fans and collectors,” Frantz wrote. “Activity that begins as a means of recreation and pleasure is prone to change when avocation becomes vocation. … [I]t has an unfortunate tendency to bring out the worst in some people.”

I think that’s the rub. Stories like those in Fandom: Confidential occur when the idealism and passion of fen become overwhelmed by a fan’s caring too much about something that takes up too much of their time, energy, and attention. Regardless of whether you believe FIAWOL or FIJAGH, don’t lose your sense of wonder. If fandom becomes just another job, we’re doing it wrong.

Tuesday, May 03, 2022

LOC for Opuntia #522

The following is a letter of comment sent to Dale Speirs, editor of Opuntia, commenting on #522.

Dear Mr. Speirs:

It’s been a while since I’ve last read—or written to—you, and I recall Opuntia and your approach to topics of mutual interest fondly. I think I first encountered your writing via FAPA more than a decade ago, but we might have also traded fanzines through the mail. I hope that you and yours are doing well, and I was pleased to see many of the themes and topics that first drew me to Opuntia continue in full force—and then some—in the recent issue (#522, and there’s already a #523!) that I downloaded from eFanzines.

In fact, you recently came up in another letter of comment. In Fadeaway #67, Robert Jennings mused about the fate and future of the humble postcard. Writing in response to that issue, I said:

Your commentary on the fate and future of postcards gave me food for thought. I still enjoy sending and receiving postcards, sometimes finding them too short for proper correspondence but useful for sharing places I’ve gone to with friends and family. (I also pilfer hotel stationery for use when it’s available.) When I receive a postcard, we usually post it to the refrigerator, and when we clear space for more, we set them aside. We have quite a sizable stock of postcards—used and unused—that we’ve accumulated over the years, and I’ve occasionally picked up sets related to The Onion, DC Comics, and the like. In fact, I’ve been tempted recently by a set issued late last year by Clarkson Potter: Dungeons & Dragons—Archival Art from Every Edition, an intriguing 100-card set. Per Diem Printing offers a fun set of 25 vintage comic book covers, as well as one featuring covers from Weekly World News. Must. Not. Acquire!

But I think the reason for the decline of postcards is clear: Texting, email, and social media. Usage of postcards has probably declined in step with general correspondence and letter writing as people have adopted new ways of communicating and sharing their experiences. I’d wager that below a certain age, perhaps indeterminate, people are more likely to post to Instagram or TikTok a highlight from their experiences than to send a postcard. Of course, such general sharing is more passive and less personal than sending someone specific a postcard intended just for them. So it goes. Personally, I prefer letters like this—even writing letters of comment as though I might mail them even if I email them as an attachment. I write differently in letter form than I do in an email. I’d be curious what Dale Speirs of Opuntia has to say—or has said—on the matter.

I’m suspicious that you’ve explored the history of the postcard and related correspondence in back issues of Opuntia. If you could point out some past numbers to explore, if indeed you have done so, I’d appreciate it. The topic seemed to be in your wheelhouse, and you can find the issue of Fadeaway online at https://tinyurl.com/Fadeaway67. In any event, I thought of you while reading another fanzine. Not bad!

I’m glad you were able to involve the progeny of Dr. Edward George Mason in the recent Calgary Philatelic Society meeting. How neat for them to be able to see his avocational work continue! I was even more interested in the intersection between philately and fandom-adjacent topics as represented in your pieces “Philatelic Fiction” as transition to “Bwah Ha! Ha!” and its focus on mad scientists, “Train of Events” considering appearances of trains in pop and pulp culture, and “Twisted Fiction.” I didn’t remember you being as fond of old movies and old-time radio as these pieces suggest, and I welcome the ongoing series offering viewing, reading, and listening recommendations.

But I am curious. How do you find such stories to read? Movies and OTR are relatively available online, but how do you locate the full text of the pulp stories you include in such pieces? I’ve been exploring digitized copies of various sf and related little magazines but have been focusing on specific magazines. Your approach seems more pointed, and I think I could learn from your method, if any.

Your review of Carol Pinchefsky’s Turn Your Fandom into Cash was interesting, and I added the title to my Want List online but did not immediately purchase the book to read. Might be a good choice for the library. Pinchefsky seems to be a relatively recent arrival to fandom, having written previous articles on quality assurance testing. Given recent conversations in other forums, I was particularly drawn to your commentary on her thoughts about con running. In the end, the book struck me as focusing on online writing, social media, and perhaps Etsy-style crafting, which could perhaps be applied to any interest. Regardless, of interest. And sure to capitalize on more recent approaches to fandom such as cosplay.

Finally, your “Current Events” and “Seen in the Literature” roundups also offer ample fodder for further exploration and learning, lending additional insight into what makes your synapses fire. All in all, appreciated.

But the pick of the issue, I must say, was your review of Carlene O’Neil’s Ripe for Murder. I ordered it and One Foot in the Grape for my mother as a Mother’s Day present, mailed to her home in the Midwest. She loves mystery novels, and my father loves trains—he’s a train spotter and model railroad enthusiast of the HO variety, active in a local modeling group and once very active (and award winning!) in related organizations and publications—so I think they’ll both get a kick out of the books. “The mysteries will be a good break from the serious material of the Senior Center book group!” my mother wrote. “It’s been such fun to find a package outside our door! … Reading the first book you sent.” We’ll see what she thinks!

I hope that you and yours are well, and I look forward to future issues of Opuntia. It’s grand to have you back on my reading pile.

Book Review: "The Last Closet: The Dark Side of Avalon" by Moira Greyland

The Last Closet: The Dark Side of Avalon by Moira Greyland (Castalia House, 2017)

I wasn’t overly active in fandom when Moira Greyland went public about the abuse suffered by her and others at the hands of her mother and father, Marion Zimmer Bradley and Walter Breen. (I was a member of the N3F, but I somehow missed the broader repercussions across fandom.) I was unaware of the 2014 uprising and fallout in terms of Bradley’s waning favor. And I wasn’t even alive during the Breendoggle that rocked Bay Area fandom in the early ’60s. So, while preparing for a medical procedure earlier this year, I turned to Greyland’s 2017 memoir, The Last Closet: The Dark Side of Avalon.

The memoir mostly focuses on the abuse Greyland experienced from Bradley and Breen, and Bradley’s covering up of Breen’s sexual activities and preferences over the years. About half the book is made up of depositions taken as part of related court cases. If you don’t know much about the Breendoggle that happened in the Bay Area in the early ’60s, or Greyland’s subsequent going public, it’s a horrific read, and not one that I’d recommend even for the most rabid rubberneckers. 

It makes absolute sense that Bradley has fallen out of favor—and that many of her books are now available only through print-on-demand editions issued by her trust. Yet after reading Greyland’s expose, I wondered whether Bradley’s work was worth returning to. Naif that I am, I haven’t even read The Mists of Avalon, which I understand to be the work that gave Bradley her unexpected wealth and prestige—though her abuse far predated her fame. (This review was previously published in slightly different form in the APA-L apazine Telegraphs & Tar Pits #4.)

Thursday, April 28, 2022

LOC for Perryscope #21

The following is a letter of comment sent to Perry Middlemiss, editor of Perryscope, commenting on #21.

Dear Mr. Middlemiss:

I’m glad to see that ANZAPA is still active! I included the apa in my Blue Moon Special directory of apae back in 2009 (mayhaps it’s time for another update; I gafiated from apahacking for about 12 years), and it’s inspiring that ANZAPA is still thriving. It has quite an impressive history dating back to 1968. I consider myself lucky to have received Perryscope #21, my first introduction to your perzine. I’ll have to check out The Alien Review, your genzine, as well. 80 pages is an impressive page count; how often do you publish issues of TAR? That page count might even qualify as a BFF, per recent discussion in the letter column of Nic Farey’s This Here… #51. It’s been a long time since I’ve published anything close to a BFF.

While I’m sorry to hear about the 2020 death of your father, the recent ceremony and family gathering sounds worthwhile and meaningful. The remains of my grandparents and other relatives of their and previous generations are scattered throughout various cemeteries in the Midwest, but my parents, my wife, and I plan to be cremated. (My wife’s father donated his body to a local university to be used for scientific research.) My wife and I have an estate plan in place, but I haven’t given any thought to what to do with my ashes at all whatsoever—and I should check in with my parents to learn their wishes, too. They’re pretty well organized as they approach 80, so I’d be surprised if it wasn’t already documented. Oh, the plans we make! I’ll also have to explore C.J. Dennis’s The Songs of a Sentimental Bloke. I belatedly condole with you and your family, though we haven’t met.

I thoroughly enjoyed your book reviews, a serious highlight of the issue. Becky Chambers’s A Psalm for the Wild-Built has popped up in a number of places, so I was familiar with the cover, at least. Otherwise, Peter F. Hamilton and Gareth L. Powell’s Light Chaser, Roger Zelazny’s Lord of Light, E. Catherine Tobler’s The Necessity of Stars, and Samuel R. Delaney’s The Einstein Intersection seem most promising based on my current tastes—even with your relatively negative reviews of the Zelazny and Delaney titles. In recent months, I’ve returned to contributing to the National Fantasy Fan Federation’s reviewzine, The N3F Review of Books. (You can browse recent issues at https://tinyurl.com/N3FReview.) We’re currently looking for new reviewers for the zine, and based on your book reviews, I’m curious whether you’d be open to some of your Perryscope reviews being reprinted in the N3F Review. We’d welcome the fresh eyes and mind, and it’d help us move beyond the borders of the United States in terms of contributors. Let me know what you think of the idea, and we can discuss.

Your exchange with John Hertz about Isaac Asimov’s writing style in the letter column gave me light food for thought. I’m currently reading Foundation—for the first time!—and will pay more attention to his writing to determine on which side of the debate I fall. I’m also somewhat into Lee Gold’s Valhalla: Absent Without Leave, so it was fun to see her book mentioned. (That reminds me; I need to swing by her house to pick up an apa!)

Thank you for contributing your perzine to ANZAPA and eFanzines. I look forward to future issues—as well as The Alien Review.

Wednesday, April 27, 2022

LOC for Wild Ideas #22

The following is a letter of comment sent to Henry Grynnsten, editor of Wild Ideas, commenting on #22.

Dear Mr. Grynnsten:

Wild Ideas #22 was my first exposure to your personal essay-driven fanzine, and I was so inspired by your approach that I am writing a letter of comment. I thank Bill Burns for including it in eFanzines; Wild Ideas isn’t quite like any other fanzine—perzine or genzine—I’ve ever encountered but is fandom-adjacent and focusing on fannish themes enough that it’s an awesome companion to other fannish fare.

Immediately, I was struck by the cover. Initially seen as an abstract line drawing in which the inked hash marks provide the overall hue, it took me a moment to see through or beneath the inking to discern the text beneath. A wonderful effect, and one I might try my hand at in the future. After eating an early afternoon lunch of salad made with cabbage, cherry tomatoes, walnuts, and apples—accompanied by Triscuit crackers—the subtly square-shaped patches also make me picture Triscuits now, as well. I am sure that was unintended. Regardless: Triscuits!

Once past the cover, I misread the issue listing at the bottom of page 1 as pieces or sections and page numbers in thish, so I was concerned that my downloaded nine-page PDF was incomplete. In fact, I had almost reached the end of the ish when I realized that it had been an issue listing—and I had to turn back to confirm. The range of topics addressed over time is diverse and intriguing—and makes me wonder what inspires you to pick a given issue’s theme. Do you maintain a running list? Are they based on connections you make in various books or articles you read, movies you see? Is Wild Ideas intertextual mortar for your House of Ideas? I shall have to seek out back issues—as well as forthcoming issues—to further explore your thought process, interests, and ideas.

In thish, which focuses on strangers, there is so much to explore, learn more about, ponder, and process. Whether you’re commenting on the concept of the noble savage, the Piraha, the Korowai, the Mashco-Piro, the Ashaninka, the Finnish, or the Swedes, several themes arise. (And you offer much more food for thought than that provided by my previous exposure to the concept of indigenous people yet to encounter surrounding civilization: The Gods Must Be Crazy.)

I’ve thoroughly enjoyed my brief sojourn into considering whether there is a natural state for mankind generally; the purpose of life and time; the causes of happiness; who we’d be, how we’d be, and what we’d do were it not for the workaday responsibilities and dross of our current civilization and society; and the very selves we bring each other upon First Contact, even if with a similarly civilized other. “‘Is it because us foreigners are here that you’re not wearing clothes?’” “Busted!” 

Not only do we make assumptions and presumptions about others based on our own backgrounds and experiences, we bring a different self to the people we meet and interact with—based on our assumptions and presumptions about them and who we might need to be for and with them. In addition, we make those assumptions and presumptions based on whatever limited set of the Other we’ve already encountered. For example, recently online, I watched a brief video of a standup comedian who described her limited exposure to Jewish people growing up—and her resulting misled expectation once she was in college, based on a single Jewish classmate, that all Jews liked guacamole.

We also bring a different self to the people we meet and interact with based on why we’re engaging. You raise the example of our vacation selves: We’re among people we don’t know and might be uncertain about, we’re looking for fun, and we have money to spend. Even in the civilized everyday world, we bring a different self to our families, neighbors, fellow pedestrians or drivers, coworkers, merchants, friends, and fellow fans. We are different online than we are offline. I am different writing a letter than I am an email. We are more or less relaxed based on the reason for being together. We are more or less self-centered. We are more or less transactional. Rarely do we—or are we able to—bring the same self to everyone we interact with throughout our daily lives.

In the end, we only know those whom we’ve met, and they only know the self we’ve presented them, consciously or unconsciously. If I’m always stressed out when I spend time with you, you’re likely to think that I’m always stressed out. And if I only know one Jewish person, and they like guacamole, maybe guac is a Jewish preference and not a personal preference.

Thank you for the ideas and information in Wild Ideas. I look forward to future issues.

Tuesday, April 26, 2022

LOC for The Obdurate Eye #15

The following is a letter of comment sent to Garth Spencer, editor of The Obdurate Eye, commenting on #15.

Dear Mr. Spencer:

Having recently come across your fanzine The Obdurate Eye #15 on eFanzines—my first exposure to your writing—I wanted to send a brief letter of comment. So I shall.

What method do you use to lessen the size of your apazine files? I just recently started submitting my apazines to Bill Burns for inclusion in eFanzines—and returned to the National Fantasy Fan Federation’s N’APA after a 13-year absence—and would welcome any tips and tricks you can offer. 

Regardless of your technical challenges accessing television, what programs have you sought out via Chromecast TV, Google Home, and your tablet? I tend not to watch TV or online videos on my iPad, but did welcome the opportunity to do so while preparing for a couple of medical procedures earlier this year. I was pleased as punch to be able to access our cable TV DVR on my tablet (a Svengoolie episode), as well as Crunchyroll (Astro Boy). I hope that you’re over the worst of your bout with COVID-19.

Your commentary on linguistics and semantics reminded me of one of my favorite sayings, which I don’t get to use often enough: Jargon is just slang for lingo. In one particular apa I’m active in, participants occasionally pick nits about word selection. A recent instance inspired me to jokingly respond using a purposeful misspelling. However, much to my disappointment, no one pointed it out. (At a recent LASFS meeting, my mispronunciation of comic book artist Bill Sienkiewicz’s name—which was decidedly incorrect—was corrected by a fellow fan; to my amusement, that correction was then also corrected, by someone who actually knows Sienkiewicz.)

The excerpt from your autobiography commenting on the challenges facing convention organizers and the value of newszines in terms of fostering common knowledge made me think of Filthy Pierre’s The Con Committee’s Guide (available at https://tinyurl.com/runacon). It’s a little dated—1984—but remains my go-to source when I have questions about con organizing. What did you do with The Maple Leaf Rag to foster common knowledge? Regardless, I’ve experienced much the same; sometimes people are fine just muddling through.

How to Human’s definition of “Agenda in Life” made me think about Sam Lubell’s approach to breaking down avocational projects: Project Classics, Project History, Project Trek, and Project Shakespeare. Being explicit about one’s areas of focus and interest is something I’ve done on an informal basis—and I think the concept merits additional consideration. I remember being surprised when I first learned there were multiple phonetic alphabets. In addition to the NATO phonetic alphabet, Western Union also had one of its own, for example.

In the letter column, Lloyd Penney’s remark on Kumospace—”[W]ith hundreds, if not thousands of social media platforms, it’s doing an even better job of keeping us apart”—gave me pause. Given recent news about Twitter, where I curate articles related to business, marketing, technology, culture, and fandom almost every day—Elon Musk bought it—I’ve been considering returning to blogging more actively. We’ll see how well my tweets transform into longer-form blog entries at http://mediadiet.net/—as well as whether anyone finds or engages with them. Already, the N3F, in which I’m active, has some members who participate in Facebook, some involved in MeWe (another social media platform), and some not online at all. Even our clubzines don’t reach a critical mass of our members.

So your comment that even at cons in the 1980s, the shared understanding—or common knowledge, again!—of what fandom was piqued my interest. I’ve seen this in recent years at the San Diego Comic-Con, the Los Angeles Comic Book Convention… and less so at Loscon, which is much less of a mediacon and therefore attracts fewer “tourists.” I missed the most recent Gallifrey One, so I’m not sure how much of a traditional con it is these days. But there definitely seems to be more room for people less involved in fandom to participate in such events. Personally, I think it’s caused by the wider range of online outlets for fandom and information of a fannish nature, which were previously served through cons, fanzines, and the like—fandom has entered the mainstream to some extent. I also think the multitude of entry points is a good thing. But we do need to be more mindful of the capabilities and needs of that broader spectrum of fen.

Thank you for encouraging readers to submit book reviews to The N3F Review of Books. I second the motion! You can see some recent reviews of my own in the March 2022 edition. And I just sent Mr. Phillies another batch of reviews for the forthcoming issue. Even if you review books for a fanzine or apazine, we’re open to reprints. Right now, we depend heavily on several online sources and are looking to diversify our reviewers.

Well, that’s it for now. I hope you and yours are doing well. I’m currently reading A.E. van Vogt’s Mission: Interplanetary, which is enjoyable so far—and tonight is movie night with a friend: either In the Year 2889 or Mars Needs Women, both directed by Larry Buchanan.

Thursday, April 21, 2022

LOC for Tightbeam #331

The following is a letter of comment sent to George Phillies, editor of Tightbeam, commenting on #331.

Dear Mr. Phillies:

Jose Sanchez’s cover to Tightbeam #331 (April 2022) is amazing! Between this cover and Alan White’s recent cover for Eldritch Science, we’re really pulling out all the stops in terms of cover art in recent months. The back cover, while an older piece, is also impressive. Wonderful book ending, and what a joy to behold. I look forward to seeing more of Jose’s work.

    I like your use of the phrase “N3F Revival.” We are indeed enjoying fine days in terms of fanzine and apa activity. The migration of some material from Tightbeam to FanActivity Gazette makes total sense thematically, and we now have a proper newszine. I was sorry to hear that Silver Empire shut up shop. Hopefully, if rights to the works they published weren’t already held by the writers, the rights have reverted so we can see other publishers reprint and distribute their former catalog. I wasn’t familiar with them previously, so I don’t even know what I was missing. But “heroic, wondrous adventure fiction” sounds up my alley.

    Graham J. “GrayJay” Darling’s letter of comment on the mistaken origin of the unicorn and its cultural importance goes beyond my brief comments in response to Tightbeam #330, and I resonated with his reference to Physiologus and T.H. White’s consideration of the unicorn as an “ur-wild beast that could only be tamed by a gentle maiden.”

    While I was somewhat familiar with the recent scandal involving comic book and fiction author Warren Ellis, I was unaware he’d penned an anime, FreakAngels, as reviewed by Jessi Silver. Interestingly, it started as a Web comic and was later collected and published by Avatar Press, which has published multiple Ellis comics over the years. I might have to look for the Avatar edition before checking out the animated series.

    Thomas E. Simmons’s comic book reviews are a welcome addition, and we get reviews of three issues of Shogun Warriors! I have the third issue and another in storage and will have to return to the series based on Simmons’s comments. I hope to see more of his writing in the future.

    I appreciated Jon D. Swartz’s bio-bibliography of Frederik Pohl. His origins in the Futurians, fandom, and sf magazines are fascinating, and Mr. Swartz’s profile makes me want to return to his writing. I have a handful of his books cataloged in my personal library, including Alternating Currents, Shadow of Tomorrow, Space Merchants, and the anthology Star Science Fiction Stories No. 3. Which do you recommend I dip into first?

    Will Mayo’s short reviews are always welcome, and we end the issue with your recipe for Greek stew. I’ve yet to make any of the recipes offered in Cedar Sanderson’s column. Have any Neffers made anything in particular that they’d recommend?

    Thanks to all who submitted content to this ish of Tightbeam. It was well worth reading.

LOC for The National Fantasy Fan Vol. 81 #3

The following is a letter of comment sent to George Phillies, editor of The National Fantasy Fan, commenting on Vol. 81 #3.

Dear Mr. Phillies:

I received the March issue of The National Fantasy Fan (Vol. 81 #3) a few weeks ago, but it’s still the most recent ish on hand, so I still have time to comment. Phew! Kudos on undertaking the herculean task that is the Neffy Awards. You should still have my nominations from December; feel free to use as many of them as you see fit for the current categories. I am looking forward to the opportunity to vote on the best of 2021!

    What Facebook groups do you recommend members join? I’ve been enjoying the N3F Facebook and MeWe groups and have recently branched out to checking out a few others. Depending on a Neffers’ involvement and participation in fandom, folks might also appreciate and enjoy the FAAnEds, SF Fandom, Corflu 39, and Science Fiction groups—among others. I’d love to know which groups you recommend.

    Mr. Trainor, I would welcome the opportunity to buy an N3F T-shirt, perhaps screen printed with the illo in the top left corner of thish’s cover. That’s a mighty fine looking logo. Is it the work of Alan White? Even the older logo included on the N3F’s Fancyclopedia 3 Web page would make an excellent T-shirt. I continue to support the idea of an N3F gathering or mini-convention in Nevada next fall. Neffercon! I plan to wear my club T-shirt there.

    Welcome to new members Amy Brodhead, Tiffanie Gray, Lisa Nybaek, Lisbet Rasmussen, Ed Stapleton, Michael Williamson, Clark Wilson, Jami Wilson, Jagi Lamplighter Wright, and John C. Wright. I’m glad you joined.

    For those of you who haven’t worked with the Writer’s Exchange Bureau yet, let me tell you: It’s worth it! Not too long ago, I sent in a short story for comment and feedback. Not one, but two fellow Neffers—Judy Carroll and Denise Fisk—spent time with my story and sent thoughtful, in-depth feedback that will be eminently useful as I revise and continue to work on the story. Thank you very much to those involved in the bureau. Revisiting the piece given your input could even lead to a submission to the annual short story contest! I appreciate your help and support.

    I bet Lloyd Penney’s right. In his letter of comment, he suggests that the old N3F Fische Bureau might have trafficked in microfiche. I know that well into the ’90s, as a university student, researcher, and journalist, I was often called on to use microfiche to access the archives of various newspapers. It would have made sense—and been future-thinking—at the time to reduce fanzines and other fannish materials to such a format. I wonder where all that stuff ended up! Just imagine a stockpile of old fannish microfiche. Shiver!

       Bob Jennings makes an excellent suggestion for next year’s Neffys: Offer separate categories for Best Novel and Best Anthology. That makes total sense to me. Bob, your update on the later Planet Comics reprints and revitalized series (Blackthorn, Pacific) was welcome indeed. And speaking of comic books, John Swartz’s shift from classic franchise characters to sf- and fandom-related comic book titles is a welcome transition. His profile of Mystery in Space inspired me to turn to the portion of my comic book collection that I’ve cataloged to see what I have on hand to read. Alas, I haven’t documented any from that series yet, but I do have two issues of Strange Adventures that I’ve cataloged. I’ll have to revisit them. The Interplanetary Insurance and Space Cabby stories sound interesting, if a little goofy and mundane. And your inclusion of Ron Goulart’s works in the Sources listing was poignant given his death in January (https://tinyurl.com/GoulartObit).

    A solid issue with plenty to explore and learn. Looking forward to the next ish!

LOC for Nice Distinctions #34

The following is a letter of comment sent to Arthur Hlavaty, editor of Nice Distinctions, commenting on issue #34.

Dear Mr. Hlavaty:

Thank you for emailing me Nice Distinctions #34. It’s been a while since we’ve exchanged zines or correspondence, and I didn’t quite know what to expect. What a delightful surprise. I see that ND is also available as a PDF, as mentioned on the Robert Anton Wilson Twitter account last month—and posted on eFanzines, no less. That’s slightly easier to read, but I quite like the lo-fi approach of a text-only email. Where do you post on social media? Facebook, I gather; I haven’t explored your LiveJournal in recent days. Regardless, two years between issues is a long time, though understandable given the pandemic. It’s good to have you in my inbox.

While I’m sorry to hear about your health concerns, I’m glad you’re relatively hale and hearty. Reading what you consider the best of your social media commentary is an interesting experience. It’s a free-flowing stream of consciousness, similar to my Common Book items in the weekly email newsletter Media Diet—or Dave Hickey’s Wasted Words and Dust Bunnies, books that collected his social media posts from almost a decade ago. The result is a fun and thought-provoking peek into what’s going on inside that skull of yours.

I enjoyed the random walk through your comments on technology, privacy, politics, science fiction, fanzines, Octavia Butler reprints, transgression, police brutality, the pandemic, gender and race, fandom, cover art, and other topics. I was intrigued by your comment on sf authors contributing to men’s magazines such as Playboy and Rogue. I’ll have to explore that further. I’ll also have to check out Outworlds #71—sounds like a bumper issue!

But mostly you added to my reading list: Isaac Asimov, Butler, Harlan Ellison, Robert A. Heinlein (I recently enjoyed The Door into Summer, which was… made into a movie!), Hugh Kenner, Roger Zelazny, and others. And I’m inspired to seek you out more on Facebook. You don’t always show up in the algorithm-driven stream.

Hope you’re well, and glad to see you continuing to publish. I’ve enjoyed remaining in your loop over the years.


LOC for Fadeaway #67

The following is a letter of comment sent to Robert Jennings, editor of Fadeaway, commenting on issue #67.

Dear Mr. Jennings:


Earlier this year, I received a copy of Fadeaway #67 through

the National Fantasy Fan Federation’s franking service. I

quite enjoyed the cover and other artwork by—and

information about—Arthur Radebaugh. His approach to

combining the fantastic and “designs for modern living” was

wonderful, and that picture of him in his converted van studio

suggests he lived the life of Riley. I’ll have to look for more

examples of “Closer Than We Think.” His work does work

well in newsprint!

Your commentary on the fate and future of postcards gave me food for thought. I still enjoy sending and receiving postcards, sometimes finding them too short for proper correspondence but useful for sharing places I’ve gone to with friends and family. (I also pilfer hotel stationery for use when it’s available.) When I receive a postcard, we usually post it to the refrigerator, and when we clear space for more, we set them aside. We have quite a sizable stock of postcards—used and unused—that we’ve accumulated over the years, and I’ve occasionally picked up sets related to The Onion, DC Comics, and the like. In fact, I’ve been tempted recently by a set issued late last year by Clarkson Potter: Dungeons & Dragons—Archival Art from Every Edition, an intriguing 100-card set. Per Diem Printing offers a fun set of 25 vintage comic book covers, as well as one featuring covers from Weekly World News. Must. Not. Acquire!

But I think the reason for the decline of postcards is clear: Texting, email, and social media. Usage of postcards has probably declined in step with general correspondence and letter writing as people have adopted new ways of communicating and sharing their experiences. I’d wager that below a certain age, perhaps indeterminate, people are more likely to post to Instagram or TikTok a highlight from their experiences than to send a postcard. Of course, such general sharing is more passive and less personal than sending someone specific a postcard intended just for them. So it goes. Personally, I prefer letters like this—even writing letters of comment as though I might mail them even if I email them as an attachment. I write differently in letter form than I do in an email. I’d be curious what Dale Spiers of Opuntia has to say—or has said—on the matter.

David M. Shea’s exploration of fans who write and why they stop also gave me pause. Over the years, I’ve pursued various forms of writing as a vocation and avocationally: journalism, professional writing, and different kinds of fan writing: reviews, columns, interviews, articles, even poetry. I’ve received multiple rejection letters from Asimov’s for poetry submissions and one from Weird Tales for a short story that I’m currently workshopping with the N3F’s Writers Exchange. I ended up publishing most of my rejected work in apazines, which is a fine outlet for me, but I might turn to sending work to other people for consideration for inclusion in their fanzines. One fan editor friend recently said, “Your poetry seems fine; I don’t know why Asimov’s would reject [it]. I’d be glad to get some of your poems.” There’s something rewarding and validating about someone else publishing your work even if it’s not paid. These days, I write for work, for a scholarly journal, and for apazines and fanzines. But fiction is something I’ve largely avoided. Stories take more time for me than other forms of writing, and as a dilettante, I often tire of story ideas before I complete a piece. Workshopping my rejected Weird Tales story is an attempt to push past that tendency.

As a relatively long-standing employee of Google, I was fascinated by Rob Imes’s analysis of changes in YouTube over time. I met the founders before the video platform’s acquisition, and I’m sometimes curious what they think about its evolution over time. I mostly dip into YouTube when I’m looking for something specific, like a movie trailer, music video, or an old cartoon. During the pandemic, I’ve been watching David Lynch’s daily weather reports with some regularity. And I briefly experimented with posting video blogs of comic book reviews in order to repost the transcriptions as reviews on my blog and elsewhere. That didn’t last long, but it was a fun spurt of creativity. (I even bought one of those halo lights and a decent microphone in my enthusiasm. Silly man.)

But I haven’t given as much thought to the evolution of the platform—or its video ecosystem—as Imes has through a fannish lens. His walk through of notable fandom-related content, including a mention of Ian Shires, came close to inspiring me to make notes of things I want to check out. But to be honest, video is not my preferred mode of entertainment or learning. I’d rather read or write. So I chuckled at his admission of not including links on purpose and might not even end up exploring any of what he commented on, despite the wide range of options related to fandom. Regardless, Imes’s commentary on YouTubers’ efforts to emerge as experts or people knowledgeable on a given topic is worth considering. If video—or podcasts, for that matter—become the most widely used mode of communicating information, what happens if the people making the videos or podcasts don’t know what they’re talking about? Other newcomers won’t be able to discern the quality of information they’re receiving. Robert Beerbohm’s concerns are valid: “You have a lot yet to learn if you think you can teach about the history of comics.” Somehow, leaving comments and posting response videos hardly seem adequate. Certainly, if online video’s your thing, there’s a ton to explore. That’s pretty cool.

I found the letter column rich and rewarding. Your exchange with Lloyd Penney on the culture wars encroaching on fandom (or as Bill Plott put it, “feud-dom”) was interesting, and Gary Brown’s recollection of the SyFy Channel’s rebranding made me chuckle. I winced, too, at the time, but the network was able to make a go of it. Imagine an alternate world in which it became the Skiffy Channel or Scientifiction Channel! I also enjoyed Plott’s remarks on Archie comics. I try to buy a digest or three whenever I see them at the grocery store—to do my part to help keep them firmly ensconced by the checkout. While it’s true that Archie has modernized many of the series leading up to and related to the television show Riverdale (Mark Waid had a hand in that), they seem to respect their history, even if they’re a bit uneven in terms of what decades they showcase. After all, old Archie is the best Archie. And I appreciated the back and forth on the uneven quality of Alpha Video’s film transfers. Last night, a friend and I watched The Red House on an Alpha DVD, and the transfer was actually quite good—at least better than many of the Mill Creek DVDs I’ve accumulated over the years.

While Alpha Video’s DVD covers rank among the most garish I’ve ever seen, Fadeaway’s back cover was a delight. Just imagine the gyroscope and accelerometer necessary to maintain the balance of such a vehicle! Preposterous and wonderful. Like all the best things in life.